Pukhtoon Students Federation

Pukhtoon Students Federation
A student organization that is leftist, secular, liberal, progressive and nationalist in nature. It is the student wing of Awami National Party. It was formed in 1968. It is present in numerous educational institutions of Pakistan. Bashir Sherpao from Charsadda, Peshawar is the President of PSF.

University Of Malakand

University Of Malakand
A public university located in Chakdara, Dir Valley of Kyber Pukhtoonkhwa i-e- Malakand Division. It was founded in 2001 by the then President Pervez Musharraf. It provides regular & private Bachelors degrees (BA/BSc/BBA/BIT/BCom/BCS), regular Honours degrees (BA Hons/BS Hons/BBA Hons/BBT Hons/PharmD/BCS Hons/BIT Hons), Master degrees (MA/MSc/MCS/MBA/BEd/LLB/MCom/MIT) & post-graduate degrees such as MPhil, MS & PhD in various disciplines & MEd. It has 14 departments. Dr Rasool Jan from Kabal, Swat is it's Vice-Chancellor & Governer NWFP Owais Ghani is it's Chancellor. Zeeshan Khan Sawabiwal is the President of Pukhtoon Students Federation there. It has 3 hostels i-e- Girls Hostel, Asif Aziz Hostel & Khalid Osman Hostel.

Sunday, July 3, 2011

PSF UOM 5th Convention!!!

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Education Minister Sardar Hussain Babak, Member KP Assembly from Swat Wajid Ali Khan, Member KP Assembly from Dir Haji Hidayat Ullah Khan, Advisor to PSF Pakhtunkhwa Arbab Tahir Khalil, ANP Lower Dir President Hussain Shah Yousafzai, ANP Malakand President & Ex-Member NWFP Assembly Shoaib Khan Dada, ANP Foreign Affairs Secretary Dr Hyder Ali & PSF Pakhtunkhwa President Majid Khan addressing the convention

PSF UOM workers arranging the stage

PSF UOM group photo
(Sitting: Ismail Maidani Stage Sec, Campus GS Salman Shamozai, Ajmal Khan, Campus President Jawad Khan, President Asif Aziz Hostel & Senior Vice President Naeem Major)

Ex-Campus President Idrees Khan (centre) looking at the arrangments

PSF UOM entering Fishing Hut for Convention

PSF UOM 5th Convention welcome banner


PSF UOM 5th Convention invitation banner


  • The convention started on 5 PM at Fishing Hut, Chakdara, Dir, Pakhtunkhwa with Music.
  • Founding member of PSF UOM Dr Rahmat Ali lala held the stage while President PSF UOM Adnan Bacha & Founder President PSF UOM Masters Basit Safi helped him.
  • After Asar prayers break, the leaders of PSF, ANP and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government addressed the convention which included:
  1. Khalid Osman Zalmay (Founder President PSF UOM): Who said that everything thing in Malakand University owes itself to PSF UOM & we are the true followers of Baacha Khan's non-violent philosophy.
  2. Hussain Shah Yusufzai (President ANP Lower Dir): Who said that PSF UOM has put the red flags in Malakand Division which was misguided by extremists.
  3. Majid Khan (PSF Pakhtunkhwa President): Who said that this convention is the continuation of peace conventions all around Pakhtunkhwa.
  4. Shoaib Khan Dada (Leader ANP Malakand): Who appreciated PSF UOM to work in difficult times and appreciated the efforts of Khalid Osman Zalmay, Kamran Khan, Ilyas Khattak and Zakir Nangyaly.
  5. Haji Hidayat Ullah (Member Khyber Pakhtunkhwa assembly): Who praised the work of PSF UOM and stressed the importance of PSF as todays leadership has emerged from PSF.
  6. Wajid Ali Khan (Member KP assembly): Who said ANP had won identity and has now won autonomy.
  7. Dr Hyder Ali Khan (ANP Foreign Affairs Secretary): Who said that PSF has now become a world power and the philosophy has reached all over the world.
  8. Sardar Hussain Babak (KP Education Minister): Who delivered a long and fiery speech on the damage done by the militants and the political wings of the extremists.
  9. Arbab Tahir Khalil (Advisor PSF Pakhtunkhwa): Who said that now celebrations will be held regarding the achievement of Provincial Autonomy through 18th Amendment passed by ANP and its allies.
  • After the speeches the PSF workers shouted their slogans Nara Wali! Nara Pukhtoon! PSF! Pukhtoonwali Pukhtoonwali! Ay Wali! Pakhtunkhwa! Lar ao Bar Yo Afghan! and Inqilab Inqilab!
  • Every one stood for Pashtun National Anthem!
  • After the end of speeches, there was a cultural show in which the following singers performed:
  1. Tariq Shah
  2. Imran Saaz Khan
  3. Nazaneen
  4. Ainee Khan
  5. Rashid Khan
Heavy rain interrupted the music night but PSF UOM managed to reorganize the show after the horrible rain.

Congrats to PSF UOM!

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

THE ISSUE OF "PAKHTUNISTAN" by Basit Khan Safi


(THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS BASED UPON FACTS & NOT AN OPINION)


(Note: The following article is the personal opinion of the author and may not reflect the opinion of PSF UOM)

PAKHTUNISTAN FLAG

OLD FLAG OF PASHTUNISTAN

Ahmad Shah Abdali's flag

Afghanistan vigorously protested the inclusion of Pashtun and Baluch areas within Pakistan without providing the inhabitants with an opportunity for self-determination. The Durrani monarchy went to the extent of opposing Pakistan’s admission to the United Nations and raised irredentist claims to the Pashto speaking areas of NWFP and Balochistan provinces of Pakistan. A ‘Pakhtunistan’ flag was raised in Kabul, alongside the Afghan national flag, as early as September 2, 1947.
The partitioning and the creation of Pakistan caused a lot of the nomad’s business partners to flee to India, which further damaged the nomad’s trade. The regulation of movement across the border became even more tight under the Pakistani government. Since 1947, this problem has led to incidents along the border, with extensive disruption of normal trade patterns.
Although both Afghanistan and Pakistan made conciliatory gestures, the matter remained unresolved. In one of the government's attempts to suppress tribal uprisings in 1949, a Pakistani Air Force plane bombed a village just across the frontier. In response, the Afghan government called a loya jirgah, which promptly declared that it recognized "neither the imaginary Durand nor any similar line" and that all agreements -- from the 1893 Durand agreement onward -- pertaining to the issue were void.
In Kabul on July 26, 1949, the Afghan Government convened a hand-picked Loya Jirga. It included the members of National Assembly. The Afghan parliament made a proclamation against Pakistan, and in favor of the Pashtuns’ right of self-determination. In disregard to the established global norms and international laws, it passed a resolution, rejecting, unilaterally, all treaties, conventions, and agreements concluded between the Afghan government and the British India government. The Jirga passed a resolution in support of Pchtoonistan and declared the 1893 Durand Agreement, the Anglo-Afghan Pact of 1905, the Independence Treaty of Rawalpindi of 1919, the Anglo-Afghan Treaty of 1921 and other treaties and agreements in regard to international border between Afghanistan and Pakistan (based on Durand Line) and in regard to the status of the Pashtoons (Pathans) as null and void, having no legal implication. In addition, to reaffirm this abrogation, Pashtunistan Day was declared to be officially celebrated every year on August 31.
On 12 August 1949, a group of Afridi tribesmen was called in a meeting in Tirah tribal territory to establish a Pakhtoon Assembly. Another isolated meeting at Razmak in Waziristan, elected the Faqir of Ipi, as "President of Pashtoonistan". He had earlier served as Chairman of the "Provisional Assembly of Independent Pashtoonistan". It was known that the Faqir Ipi had been in league with the Red Shirts or the Khudai Khidmatgars of Abdul Ghaffar Khan.
The issue of an international boundary through Pashtun areas was of great importance to policymakers in Kabul. Pakistan halted vital transshipments of petroleum to Afghanistan for about three months in 1950, presumably in retaliation for Afghan tribal attacks across the border. At this time, Afghan government interest shifted to offers of aid from the Soviet Union and in July 1950 it signed a major agreement with the Soviet Union.
Afghanistan became more active as it moved two armored divisions and its air force along the Afghan-Pakistan border, presumably with a hope that it might give moral support to certain tribal interests on the Pakistan side of the Durand Line. The Afghan campaign reached its climax when, in 1950, Afghan King Zahir Shah made an anti-Pakistan speech at a celebration in Kabul. The Afghanistan flag was hoisted, as anti-Pakistan leaflets were dropped by the Afghan air force into tribal areas. Ultimately, on January 9, 1950, Liaquat Ali Khan, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, condemned Afghanistan for its hostilities in the parliament.
In the summer of 1950, armed clashes occured between Afghanistan and Pakistan in the neighborhood of Gwazha, north of Quetta. On September 30, 1950, a more serious incident took place when a large Afghan force (commanded by a brigadier and supported by artillery and machine guns,) invaded Pakistan in Dobandi area, about 30 miles north east of Chaman. In the initial thrust they cleared a border security post of section strength comprising twelve persons and occupied the Bogra Pass(about four miles inside the Pakistan territory.) Their objective, it seemed, was to cut off the strategic Chaman-Quetta railway line passing through the Khojak Pass. On October 5, they were driven out by Pakistan Army which was supported by Pakistan Air Force. On October 7, Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan said in the Parliament that "having utterly failed to suborn the loyalty of our tribesmen, they have started organizing raids into our territory by Afghan tribesmen and elements of the Afghan Army".
During 1950 and 1951, Afghan nationals continued raiding of and on across the border into Pakistan along the Durand Line. Irregular forces led by a local Pashtun leader crossed the border in 1950 and 1951 to back Afghan claims.
Pakistan Government dealt with these raids effectively. Pakistan's government refused to accept the Afghan assertion that it had no control over these men, and both nations' ambassadors were withdrawn, but were exchanged again a few months later. It also lodged protests with the Government of Afghanistan. Pakistan in a counter-move took some measures with regard to Afghan transit trade which passed through the port of Karachi. The pressure thus began telling on the land-locked Afghanistan. About that time a "Radio Free Afghanistan" also started broadcasting programs to dissidents in Afghanistan. This new tit-for-tat policy paid dividends and forays from across the Durand Line were reduced in frequency. Meanwhile, most foreign countries assumed a neutral and dis-interested posture to Pak-Afghan differences. This also held true for the USA which was fast replacing Britain in the Middle East and South Asia.
In 1955 Pakistan decided to amalgamate the NWFP into the newly formed province of West Pakistan. The Afghan government denounced the merger of West Pakistan’s provinces, Tribal Territories and Princely States. On March 30, 1955, this led to an ugly incident, when Afghan demonstrators attacked and looted the Pakistani embassy in Kabul, and the Pakistan flag was torn down. Mobs ransacked the Pakistani consulates in Jalalabad and Kandahar. After Pakistan's Embassy in Afghanistan was attacked, Pakistan retaliated by strangling Afghan's landlocked economy.
Normal trade and diplomatic relations were resumed between Afghanistan and Pakistan on September 9, 1955. But a report on November 16, 1955 disseminated by the White House said, “the Afghan government is strongly - even irrationally - committed to its Pashtunistan policy, which seeks as a minimum ‘self determination’ or ‘autonomy’ for the Pashtuns in north-western Pakistan. Although the Afghans officially deny any interest in extending Afghanistan’s borders, the campaign undoubtedly has irredentist overtones.”
The links between the political leaders of the North-West Frontier Province and the Hindu leaders of Congress were such that a majority in the North-West Frontier Province assembly originally voted to go with India in the partition, a decision which probably would have been rejected by the voting majority in the province.
President Sardar Muhammad Daud Khan remarked that the “British did a wrong thing many years ago and we have been fighting to rectify it. Until that is done the struggle will continue.”

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

PSF UOM trip to Wali Bagh (Charsadda), The Mecca of Pashtun national movement!


















Trip to Wali Bagh, Charsadda Slideshow

Trip to Wali Bagh, Charsadda Slideshow: "TripAdvisor™ TripWow ★ Trip to Wali Bagh, Charsadda Slideshow ★ to Wali Bagh (Charsadda) and Pakhtunkhwa (near Mardan). Stunning free travel slideshows on TripAdvisor"

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Sexual harassment in Universities !

Sexual harassment on campus: Universities oblivious of HEC guidelines..

 

PESHAWAR, May 20: None of the public sector universities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has complied with the Higher Education Commission`s (HEC) policy guidelines to prevent sexual harassment on the campus, it is learnt.
Being regulator of higher education institutions the HEC had formulated a year ago an elaborate mechanism for dealing with the complaints related to sexual harassment on university promises.
However, none of the universities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa had implemented the mechanism as per policy, according to investigations being carried out by a high-level committee of the provincial government.
The government had constituted a committee under provincial minister Sitara Ayaz to look into the complaints of sexual harassment at the University of Peshawar (UoP), as raised at the provincial assembly last month.
The committee besides looking into the affairs of the universities was also verifying whether they have put in place effective measures against sexual harassment or not.
A member of the probe committee, wishing anonymity, told Dawn that to the astonishment of the committee none of the public sector universities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has followed the HEC policy guidelines.
“The UoP management has no idea that they have the HEC policy guidelines on the issue,” lamented this member, while citing the university management`s reply to the committee`s queries.
Sitara Ayaz argued that it had been a major failure on the part of university administrations that they did not implement the HEC guidelines and increased the vulnerability of different people to sexual harassment.
“Believe me, if they just implement what the guidelines say there will be hardly a complaint,” claimed Ms Ayaz, when approached by this correspondent for comments.
The probe body has checked with the administration of UoP and other government-run universities about the guidelines, she said and added that unfortunately, none of them had followed them.
“This will be our major recommendation in the report to the government to make sure the universities implement the HEC guidelines,” Ms Ayaz said and hoped that the committee would submit its report by next week to the chief minister for action.
The HEC policy guidelines, compiled through consultation involving all stakeholders, envisaged the appointment of Harassment Monitoring Officers (HMOs) and setting up of a full-time Harassment Complaint Cells (HCCs) to deal with such complaints.
As per the guidelines, the HMO is supposed to be an employee of the university to be appointed by Syndicate, Executive Council or Board of Governors with minimum 10 years of service experience in the same institution and bearing sound reputation.
The HMO will develop tools, educational programmes etc to promote awareness and foster an environment free of sexual harassment in the institution besides carrying out complaint resolution through informal and formal means.
Apart from this, as per the guidelines the HMO will also act as an impartial counsellor and advisor to any member of the university and maintain an unbiased attitude to all complaints.
The university administrations were required to set up an HCC to facilitate policy implementation. Complaints of sexual harassment or any other forms of harassment could be lodged with this cell.
This would require a team consisting of a full-time trained professional HMO, computer specialist and assistant, who could follow up the documentation through relevant offices.
This cell was required to sensitise all university faculty, staff and students to sexual harassment through workshops and trainings. All staff/faculty that enter the university employment would require completing a three-day essential sensitisation training programme as an ongoing activity.
Another member of the probe committee, wishing anonymity, told Dawn that the UoP`s step of suspending a teacher of History Department had been taken without following the procedures defined in the HEC guidelines.
Citing the guidelines, this member said that resolution of complaints could be made through counselling at first step. However, if the complainant wishes to follow through the hearing and tribunal procedures, he/she would be required to fill a complaint form that would be available in the cell.
“But it did not happen in this particular case,” the member pointed out.
When contacted, a spokesperson for the Peshawar University insisted that they had complied with what the HEC had advised them. He, however, clarified that setting up of Complaint Cell and appointment of HMO involves financial implications and thus requires approval of different forums.
“Compliance with the HEC guidelines takes time,” argued the spokesperson.
Share
Read more:
Print This Post Print This Post

PukhTooN Student Fedration UOM Condems! If it Non-stop or Any such case cames PSF will Throw away the Social Dirties!!